Root of unity modulo n

5 min read
In 3 languages

In mathematics, a kth root of unity modulo n for positive integers k, n ≥ 2, is a root of unity in the ring of integers modulo n; that is, a solution x to the equation (or congruence) $x^{k}\equiv 1{\pmod {n}}$ . If k is the smallest such exponent for x, then x is called a primitive kth root of unity modulo n. See modular arithmetic for notation and terminology.

The roots of unity modulo n are exactly the integers that are coprime with n. In fact, these integers are roots of unity modulo n by Euler's theorem, and the other integers cannot be roots of unity modulo n, because they are zero divisors modulo n.

A primitive root modulo n, is a generator of the group of units of the ring of integers modulo n. There exist primitive roots modulo n if and only if $\lambda (n)=\varphi (n),$ where $\lambda$ and $\varphi$ are respectively the Carmichael function and Euler's totient function.

A root of unity modulo n is a primitive kth root of unity modulo n for some divisor k of $\lambda (n),$ and, conversely, there are primitive kth roots of unity modulo n if and only if k is a divisor of $\lambda (n).$

Roots of unity

Properties

If x is a kth root of unity modulo n, then x is a unit (invertible) whose inverse is $x^{k-1}$ . That is, x and n are coprime.
If x is a unit, then it is a (primitive) kth root of unity modulo n, where k is the multiplicative order of x modulo n.
If x is a kth root of unity and $x-1$ is not a zero divisor, then $\sum _{j=0}^{k-1}x^{j}\equiv 0{\pmod {n}}$ , because

(x-1)\cdot \sum _{j=0}^{k-1}x^{j}\equiv x^{k}-1\equiv 0{\pmod {n}}.

Number of kth roots

For the lack of a widely accepted symbol, we denote the number of kth roots of unity modulo n by $f(n,k)$ . It satisfies a number of properties:

$f(n,1)=1$ for $n\geq 2$
$f(n,\lambda (n))=\varphi (n)$ where λ denotes the Carmichael function and $\varphi$ denotes Euler's totient function
$n\mapsto f(n,k)$ is a multiplicative function
$k\mid \ell \implies f(n,k)\mid f(n,\ell)$ where the bar denotes divisibility
$f(n,\operatorname {lcm} (a,b))=\operatorname {lcm} (f(n,a),f(n,b))$ where $\operatorname {lcm}$ denotes the least common multiple
For prime $p$ , $\forall i\in \mathbb {N} \ \exists j\in \mathbb {N} \ f(n,p^{i})=p^{j}$ . The precise mapping from $i$ to $j$ is not known. If it were known, then together with the previous law it would yield a way to evaluate $f$ quickly.

Examples

Let $n=7$ and $k=3$ . In this case, there are three cube roots of unity (1, 2, and 4). When $n=11$ however, there is only one cube root of unity, the unit 1 itself. This behavior is quite different from the field of complex numbers where every nonzero number has k kth roots.

Primitive roots of unity

Properties

The maximum possible radix exponent for primitive roots modulo $n$ is $\lambda (n)$ , where λ denotes the Carmichael function.
A radix exponent for a primitive root of unity is a divisor of $\lambda (n)$ .
Every divisor $k$ of $\lambda (n)$ yields a primitive $k$ th root of unity. One can obtain such a root by choosing a $\lambda (n)$ th primitive root of unity (that must exist by definition of λ), named $x$ and compute the power $x^{\lambda (n)/k}$ .
If x is a primitive kth root of unity and also a (not necessarily primitive) ℓth root of unity, then k is a divisor of ℓ. This is true, because Bézout's identity yields an integer linear combination of k and ℓ equal to $\gcd(k,\ell)$ . Since k is minimal, it must be $k=\gcd(k,\ell)$ and $\gcd(k,\ell)$ is a divisor of ℓ.

Number of primitive kth roots

For the lack of a widely accepted symbol, we denote the number of primitive kth roots of unity modulo n by $g(n,k)$ . It satisfies the following properties:

$g(n,k)={\begin{cases}>0&{\text{if }}k\mid \lambda (n),\\0&{\text{otherwise}}.\end{cases}}$
Consequently the function $k\mapsto g(n,k)$ has $d(\lambda (n))$ values different from zero, where $d$ computes the number of divisors.
$g(n,1)=1$
$g(4,2)=1$
$g(2^{n},2)=3$ for $n\geq 3$ , since -1 is always a square root of 1.
$g(2^{n},2^{k})=2^{k}$ for $k\in [2,n-1)$
$g(n,2)=1$ for $n\geq 3$ and $n$ in (sequence A033948 in the OEIS)
$\sum _{k\in \mathbb {N} }g(n,k)=f(n,\lambda (n))=\varphi (n)$ with $\varphi$ being Euler's totient function
The connection between $f$ and $g$ can be written in an elegant way using a Dirichlet convolution:

f=\mathbf {1} *g

, i.e.

f(n,k)=\sum _{d\mid k}g(n,d)

One can compute values of

g

recursively from

f

using this formula, which is equivalent to the Möbius inversion formula.

Testing whether x is a primitive kth root of unity modulo n

By fast exponentiation, one can check that $x^{k}\equiv 1{\pmod {n}}$ . If this is true, x is a kth root of unity modulo n but not necessarily primitive. If it is not a primitive root, then there would be some divisor ℓ of k, with $x^{\ell }\equiv 1{\pmod {n}}$ . In order to exclude this possibility, one has only to check for a few ℓ's equal k divided by a prime.

That is, x is a primitive kth root of unity modulo n if and only if ${\textstyle x^{k}\equiv 1{\pmod {n}}}$ and $x^{k/p}\not \equiv 1{\pmod {n}}$ for every prime divisor p of n.

For example, if $n=17,$ every positive integer less than 17 is a 16th root of unity modulo 17, and the integers that are primitive 16th roots of unity modulo 17 are exactly those such that $x^{16/2}\not \equiv 1{\pmod {17}}.$

Finding a primitive kth root of unity modulo n

Among the primitive kth roots of unity, the primitive $\lambda (n)$ th roots are most frequent. It is thus recommended to try some integers for being a primitive $\lambda (n)$ th root, what will succeed quickly. For a primitive $\lambda (n)$ th root x, the number $x^{\lambda (n)/k}$ is a primitive $k$ th root of unity. If k does not divide $\lambda (n)$ , then there will be no kth roots of unity, at all.

Finding multiple primitive kth roots modulo n

Once a primitive kth root of unity x is obtained, every power $x^{\ell }$ is a $k$ th root of unity, but not necessarily a primitive one. The power $x^{\ell }$ is a primitive $k$ th root of unity if and only if $k$ and $\ell$ are coprime. The proof is as follows: If $x^{\ell }$ is not primitive, then there exists a divisor $m$ of $k$ with $(x^{\ell })^{m}\equiv 1{\pmod {n}}$ , and since $k$ and $\ell$ are coprime, there exists integers $a,b$ such that $ak+b\ell =1$ . This yields

$x^{m}\equiv (x^{m})^{ak+b\ell }\equiv (x^{k})^{ma}((x^{\ell })^{m})^{b}\equiv 1{\pmod {n}}$ ,

which means that $x$ is not a primitive $k$ th root of unity because there is the smaller exponent $m$ .

That is, by exponentiating x one can obtain $\varphi (k)$ different primitive kth roots of unity, but these may not be all such roots. However, finding all of them is not so easy.

Finding an n with a primitive kth root of unity modulo n

A motivating question is, in what integer residue class rings does a primitive kth root of unity exist? It can be used to compute a discrete Fourier transform (more precisely a number theoretic transform) of a $k$ -dimensional integer vector. In order to perform the inverse transform, divide by $k$ ; that is, k is also a unit modulo $n.$

A simple way to find such an n is to check for primitive kth roots with respect to the moduli in the arithmetic progression $k+1,2k+1,3k+1,\dots$ All of these moduli are coprime to k and thus k is a unit. According to Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progressions there are infinitely many primes in the progression, and for a prime $p$ , it holds $\lambda (p)=p-1$ . Thus if $mk+1$ is prime, then $\lambda (mk+1)=mk$ , and thus there are primitive kth roots of unity. But the test for primes is too strong, and there may be other appropriate moduli.

Finding an n with multiple primitive roots of unity modulo n

To find a modulus $n$ such that there are primitive $k_{1}{\text{th}},k_{2}{\text{th}},\ldots,k_{m}{\text{th}}$ roots of unity modulo $n$ , the following theorem reduces the problem to a simpler one:

For given

n

there are primitive

k_{1}{\text{th}},\ldots,k_{m}{\text{th}}

roots of unity modulo

n

if and only if there is a primitive

\operatorname {lcm} (k_{1},\ldots,k_{m})

th root of unity modulo n.

Proof

Backward direction: If there is a primitive $\operatorname {lcm} (k_{1},\ldots,k_{m})$ th root of unity modulo $n$ called $x$ , then $x^{\operatorname {lcm} (k_{1},\ldots,k_{m})/k_{l}}$ is a $k_{l}$ th root of unity modulo $n$ .

Forward direction: If there are primitive $k_{1}{\text{th}},\ldots,k_{m}{\text{th}}$ roots of unity modulo $n$ , then all exponents $k_{1},\dots,k_{m}$ are divisors of $\lambda (n)$ . This implies $\operatorname {lcm} (k_{1},\dots,k_{m})\mid \lambda (n)$ and this in turn means there is a primitive $\operatorname {lcm} (k_{1},\ldots,k_{m})$ th root of unity modulo $n$ .